This story was originally featured on Fortune.com
^ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A (A.L.I. 1965) (“The word ‘intent’ is used throughout the Restatement of this Subject to denote that the actor desires to cause consequences of his act, or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it.”). English case law is more sparse, but the English courts have similarly suggested that “subjective recklessness” can satisfy the intent element of intentional torts. See Wilson v. Pringle [1987] QB 237; Iqbal v. Prison Officers Ass’n [2009] EWCA (Civ) 1312, [2010] QB 732.，这一点在viber中也有详细论述
[//]: # (title: Title of the article)，推荐阅读传奇私服新开网｜热血传奇SF发布站｜传奇私服网站获取更多信息
Save StorySave this story